Docket 1411
Roll call 3 of 3 at the meeting of September 24, 2025: 10 yes, 1 no, 1 not present.
This record contradicts itself
The votes recorded below don't match the tally the clerk wrote in the description. Both come from the City; neither has been changed here.
- The description says 9 voted yes; the record lists 10.
- The record lists Mejia as voting yes; the description doesn't.
- The description says 2 were not present; the record lists 1.
- The description names Mejia as not present; the record doesn't.
The motion
City Council Vote: Liquor License Conversion
The City's own summary of the docket.
The rules were suspended, the order was passed: yeas 9 (Breadon, Coletta Zapata, Durkan, FitzGerald, Louijeune, Murphy, Pepén, Santana, Weber), nays 1 (Flynn), not present 1 (Mejia), absent 1 (Worrell).
The clerk's full description
Message and order for your approval an Order To Adopt The Liquor License Conversion as a Local Option in the City of Boston. The rules were suspended, the order was passed: yeas 9 (Breadon, Coletta Zapata, Durkan, FitzGerald, Louijeune, Murphy, Pepén, Santana, Weber), nays 1 (Flynn), not present 1 (Mejia), absent 1 (Worrell).
How each councillor voted
How this record was read
The City's data gives surnames and short vote codes. These changes were made to read it, and nothing else:
- The City's record lists Fernandes Anderson with no vote; left out of the count.