Yeas & NaysBoston City Council votes

Docket 1718

Roll call 7 of 18 at the meeting of November 20, 2024: 13 yes, 0 no.

See it on boston.gov

This record contradicts itself

The votes recorded below don't match the tally the clerk wrote in the description. Both come from the City; neither has been changed here.

  • The description says 2 voted yes; the record lists 13.
  • The description says 7 voted no; the record lists none.
  • The description names Breadon, Durkan, FitzGerald, Pepén, Santana, Weber and Worrell as voting no; the record doesn't.
  • The description says 4 voted present; the record lists none.
  • The description names Coletta Zapata, Fernandes Anderson, Louijeune and Mejia as voting present; the record doesn't.

The motion

City Council Rejects Placing Election Department in State Receivership

The City's own summary of the docket.

yeas 2, nays 7 (Breadon, Durkan, FitzGerald, Pepen, Santana, Weber, Worrell), present 4 (Coletta Zapata, Fernandes Anderson, Louijeune, Mejia).

The clerk's full description

Councilors Flynn, Murphy and Fernandes Anderson offered the following: Resolution recommending the placement of the City of Boston Election Department Under State Receivership. On motion of Councilors Flynn and Murphy, the resolution failed; yeas 2, nays 7 (Breadon, Durkan, FitzGerald, Pepen, Santana, Weber, Worrell), present 4 (Coletta Zapata, Fernandes Anderson, Louijeune, Mejia).

How each councillor voted

13 recorded