Docket 1368
Roll call 2 of 4 at the meeting of August 9, 2023: 13 yes, 0 no.
This record contradicts itself
The votes recorded below don't match the tally the clerk wrote in the description. Both come from the City; neither has been changed here.
- The description says 10 voted yes; the record lists 13.
- The description says 1 voted no; the record lists none.
- The description names Flynn as voting no; the record doesn't.
This record may list an older Council
It lists Bok, Campbell, Edwards, Essaibi-George, Janey, O'Malley and Wu, who appear in fewer than half of the roll calls in the three months before and after it. Records like this seem to reuse a previous Council's roster. The votes are shown as the City published them, but left out of those councillors' voting records here.
The motion
City Council Discusses Law to Change Retirement Benefits for Boston Employees.
The City's own summary of the docket.
yeas 10, nays 1(Flynn).
The clerk's full description
Councilor Arroyo offered the following: Petition for a Special Law RE; An Act Authorizing the Retirement Board of the City of Boston to Grant Certain Retirement Benefits. On motion of Councilor Arroyo, the rules were suspended, the petition was passed; yeas 10, nays 1(Flynn).