Docket 0526
Roll call 10 of 11 at the meeting of June 9, 2021: 24 yes, 0 no, 2 not present.
This record contradicts itself
The votes recorded below don't match the tally the clerk wrote in the description. Both come from the City; neither has been changed here.
- The description says 12 voted yes; the record lists 24.
The motion
City Council Discusses and Votes on School Department Funding for the Next Fiscal Year.
The City's own summary of the docket.
yeas 12.
The clerk's full description
On the message and order, referred on April 14, 2021 Docket #0525, for an annual appropriation for the school department for FY2022, the Committee submitted a report recommending the order ought to be rejected without prejudice. The report was accepted; the order was rejected without prejudice; yeas 12.
How each councillor voted
How this record was read
The City's data gives surnames and short vote codes. These changes were made to read it, and nothing else:
- Arroyo appears more than once in this roll call.
- Baker appears more than once in this roll call.
- Bok appears more than once in this roll call.
- Breadon appears more than once in this roll call.
- Campbell appears more than once in this roll call.
- Edwards appears more than once in this roll call.
- Essaibi-George appears more than once in this roll call.
- Flaherty appears more than once in this roll call.
- Flynn appears more than once in this roll call.
- Janey appears more than once in this roll call.
- Mejia appears more than once in this roll call.
- O'Malley appears more than once in this roll call.
- Wu appears more than once in this roll call.