Docket 0104
Roll call 4 of 5 at the meeting of August 19, 2020: 9 yes, 4 no.
This record contradicts itself
The votes recorded below don't match the tally the clerk wrote in the description. Both come from the City; neither has been changed here.
- The description says 7 voted yes; the record lists 9.
- The description says 5 voted no; the record lists 4.
- The description names O'Malley as voting no; the record doesn't.
The motion
City Council Discusses and Votes on Zoning Board Appointment, Ultimately Rejecting the Candidate.
The City's own summary of the docket.
yeas 7, nays 5 (Baker, Essaibi-George, Flaherty, Flynn, O’Malley).
The clerk's full description
On the message and order, referred on January 29, 2020 Docket #0104, for the confirmation of the appointment of Timothy Burke, as a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals, for a term ending July 1, 2021, the Committee submitted a report recommending the order ought to be denied without prejudice. The report was accepted; the order was denied without prejudice; yeas 7, nays 5 (Baker, Essaibi-George, Flaherty, Flynn, O’Malley).