Docket 0652

Roll call 1 of 1 at the meeting of April 10, 2019: 20 yes, 6 no.

This record contradicts itself

The votes recorded below don't match the tally the clerk wrote in the description. Both come from the City; neither has been changed here.

The description says 9 voted yes; the record lists 20.
The description says 3 voted no; the record lists 6.

The motion

City Council Discusses and Votes on Resolution Supporting the Federal Green New Deal Proposals.

The City's own summary of the docket.

yeas 9 nays 3 (Baker, Ciommo, Garrison).

The clerk's full description

Councilors Wu, Edwards, Flynn, Janey, McCarthy O’Malley and Zakim offered the following: Resolution that the Boston City Council go on record in support of House Resolution 109 and Senate Resolution 59 “A Resolution Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal”. On motion of Councilor Wu, the rules were suspended; the resolution was adopted; yeas 9 nays 3 (Baker, Ciommo, Garrison).

The City's open dataset records this vote differently

This page follows boston.gov. The City's 2008–2024 dataset has the same roll call with these differences:

Garrison: yes in the dataset, no on boston.gov.

How this record was read

The City's data gives surnames and short vote codes. These changes were made to read it, and nothing else:

Baker appears more than once in this roll call.
Campbell appears more than once in this roll call.
Ciommo appears more than once in this roll call.
Edwards appears more than once in this roll call.
Essaibi-George appears more than once in this roll call.
Flaherty appears more than once in this roll call.
Flynn appears more than once in this roll call.
Garrison appears more than once in this roll call.
Janey appears more than once in this roll call.
McCarthy appears more than once in this roll call.
O'Malley appears more than once in this roll call.
Wu appears more than once in this roll call.
Zakim appears more than once in this roll call.